No, but you're trying to move something everyone in the league has for a more valuable commodity. RBs in this league don't move unless you pony up or it's just a flier and a draft pick is the compensation. You don't have any draft picks.for a low end rb
i'm not ripping anyone off jesus
No, but you're trying to move something everyone in the league has for a more valuable commodity. RBs in this league don't move unless you pony up or it's just a flier and a draft pick is the compensation. You don't have any draft picks.
i obviously understand that
why are you explaining this to me. i'm comfortable with my team. i'll find a rb some other time
Holler at me for Ameer or Martin. You’ll have to overpay if you want Jamaal Williamsfor a low end rb
i'm not ripping anyone off jesus
BECAUSE YOUR TEAM SUCKS. THAT'S WHY.i obviously understand that
why are you explaining this to me. i'm comfortable with my team. i'll find a rb some other time
@Ensconatus holler at me for Edmonds when DJ goes down again.
yo @Ensconatus are we doing taxi squads? if so, how many?
yo @Ensconatus are we doing taxi squads? if so, how many?
No taxi squad. Wasn’t implemented before the draft. We can have the discussion on adding it for next season tho.
@Ensconatus holler at me for Edmonds when DJ goes down again.
DJ already won me a chip so please put some respek on his name or get you one these :trophy: with Edmond.
:wooo:
basically its a way to redshirt your rookies to free up a roster spotWtf is taxi s
Even more roster space wtf hell no that sounds retardedbasically its a way to redshirt your rookies to free up a roster spot
Yeah. Even as someone who lost both Jamal Williams and Aaron Jones last year because I needed RB help for a week or two, I would be against that.Even more roster space wtf hell no that sounds retarded
I've never done taxi squad before but it sounds like a good idea to me. I had to cut a 2nd round pick last year 2 months after I drafted him because of injuries/roster size. That really blows in a dynasty format.
I don't really see why folks would be against it as it'd benefit everyone equally. It's not really "extra roster space" as you can't start the players on your taxi squad anyway. It's just a way to hold onto rookies you invested draft capital in but aren't really viable fantasy players as of yet.
That said, it's not a big deal to me so I'm not too bothered either way.
I don't really see why folks would be against it as it'd benefit everyone equally. It's not really "extra roster space" as you can't start the players on your taxi squad anyway. It's just a way to hold onto rookies you invested draft capital in but aren't really viable fantasy players as of yet.
That said, it's not a big deal to me so I'm not too bothered either way.
I’d be fine for it
Depth was fine except for those who moved a ton of picks, that’s the draw back.
Depth was fine except for those who moved a ton of picks, that’s the draw back.
Poor @Dee4.65!
But That’s the game. Gotta picks nd choose who’s staying and whyI've never done taxi squad before but it sounds like a good idea to me. I had to cut a 2nd round pick last year 2 months after I drafted him because of injuries/roster size. That really blows in a dynasty format.
I don't really see why folks would be against it as it'd benefit everyone equally. It's not really "extra roster space" as you can't start the players on your taxi squad anyway. It's just a way to hold onto rookies you invested draft capital in but aren't really viable fantasy players as of yet.
That said, it's not a big deal to me so I'm not too bothered either way.
We alreDy have IR slots
- Status
- Not open for further replies.