Guest viewing is limited

Titans Talk - Home for all things Tennessee Titans

Status
Not open for further replies.
Donks doing the dirt over Thanksgiving... yeah that would be about right.


Then monday when people are paying attention Donks would be all 'old news this is 4 days old'
 
Donks doing the dirt over Thanksgiving... yeah that would be about right.


Then monday when people are paying attention Donks would be all 'old news this is 4 days old'

LOL, already looks like BS,

Michigan elections director casts doubt on vote-hacking concerns

@Aqutis30

Chris Thomas, the longtime director of Michigan's Bureau of Elections, said Michigan doesn't use the electronic voting machines identified in the report as being the sources of potential hacking.

"We are an entire paper and optical scan state," Thomas told the Free Press this morning. "Nothing is connected to the Internet."

Thomas said any hacking would require hacking of computer software systems connected to the optical scan machines, and that would have to be done on a county-by-county basis. And "That would be very, very difficult," he said.

So how could Michigan voting machines have been "Hacked" lol
 
Ah, and could Jill Stein be the proxy?

Jill Stein, liberals seek voting hack investigation - CNNPolitics.com

Use Jill to challenge so team Hillary do not look like hypocrites. And CNN is doing their best to whip the public into a frenzy by running stories on potential hacks while excluding stories that cast doubt on the hack.

Stein's entire argument though seems to be "Hacking happens to computers, there are some machines in some counties in swing states that it is possible to hack, a lot of people do not like the outcome of the election, so an investigation needs to happen."

Jill Stein to file for recount in three states | TheHill

After a divisive and painful presidential race, reported hacks into voter and party databases and individual email accounts were causing many [Americans] to wonder if our election results are reliable," Stein said in the statement. "These concerns need to be investigated before the 2016 presidential election is certified.”
 
Also, supposedly there are Electoral Voters that have signed a petition to vote for Hillary even though the state went Red. Faithless! :p
 
the whole :bs: 'popular vote' crapola boils down to the coastal elites want LA & Chicago to determine the PotUS

c4 is +3m votes in those to craptastic examples of donktarded paradise. So outside of those 2 counties Donny is +1m votes and the elites want to allow LA & Chicago to determine the PotUS
 
Also, supposedly there are Electoral Voters that have signed a petition to vote for Hillary even though the state went Red. Faithless! :p
and the EC is done seperately in each state so the collusion would have to be done prior to 19Dec16

If there is a rush on man sized dufflebags c4 is up to something
 
Also, supposedly there are Electoral Voters that have signed a petition to vote for Hillary even though the state went Red. Faithless! :p

Yeah, they have six so far that say they will change

I have been digging deeper into this "Hacked machines" thing and it is all a load of crap. The MSM though have been going all MSM over it -- reporting only part of the story, twisting facts around, omitting key details. Here is what is going on:
  • The original article from NY mag is all wishful thinking, one of the "Experts" has already said he was badly misquoted
  • There is no "Evidence" of hacking. All they have is a minor statistical trend that counties in Wisconsin which used "Hackable" voting machines Hillary did slightly worse than counties where paper was used -- that is it
  • However, in Wisconsin rural areas use the machines, while cities use paper
  • These machines are "Hackable" the same way secure online banking is hackable, it can happen but is hard as hell
NY Mag took this info and jumped to extreme conclusions:
  • That if machines in Wisconsin were hacked then maybe Hillary really won Wisconsin
  • At the time of writing Michigan and Pennsylvania were still "too close to call" so maybe Hillary ends up winning those states too
  • And if she wins all three then she is president
However, Michigan just certified their results and Trump won.

Kooky Jill Stein, who apparently understands technology about as well as she understands vaccinations, is challenging the results in WI, PA and MI because of this flawed article. Here is where she is flawed and where anyone hoping for a Hillary victory is flawed:
  • WI is the only one of the three states where there is actual concern and it is very minor
  • It would be almost impossible for hackers to have a meaningful impact in MI because their machines do not go online. Hackers would have to physically go up to a machine and install malware on it then do that for hundreds more machines to have a real impact
  • Even if there was hacking it does not mean the election is overturned
  • And, even if there was hacking who is to say it was in Trump's favor. It could have just as easily been someone from the #NeverTrump crowd

Bottom line, do not get your hope's up over this
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the whole :bs: 'popular vote' crapola boils down to the coastal elites want LA & Chicago to determine the PotUS

c4 is +3m votes in those to craptastic examples of donktarded paradise. So outside of those 2 counties Donny is +1m votes and the elites want to allow LA & Chicago to determine the PotUS

You know Trump was originally in favor of popular vote right? People want it so the most votes becomes president instead of the same ~7 swing states every year.

Regardless, Hillary (& the dems) knew the rules when they started campaigning. Nobody is suggesting that Hillary should be president because she has more votes. Both would have campaigned very differently if it was a popular vote.
 
You know Trump was originally in favor of popular vote right? People want it so the most votes becomes president instead of the same ~7 swing states every year.

Regardless, Hillary (& the dems) knew the rules when they started campaigning. Nobody is suggesting that Hillary should be president because she has more votes. Both would have campaigned very differently if it was a popular vote.

Things change a lot over time. Both parties have gone through major shifts and with this cycle there looks to be another major shift.

The neocons have been marginalized out of the Republican party. The Democrats meanwhile have become the party of corporatism, globalization and under Hillary, war.

Trump meanwhile campaigned for the working class and inner cities.
 
You know Trump was originally in favor of popular vote right? People want it so the most votes becomes president instead of the same ~7 swing states every year.

Regardless, Hillary (& the dems) knew the rules when they started campaigning. Nobody is suggesting that Hillary should be president because she has more votes. Both would have campaigned very differently if it was a popular vote.
No I don't I don't want NY, CALI, deciding my fate...we are NOT a democracy...we are a Democratic Republic...
 
Well, there is a new sheriff in town
Sherrif.jpg
 
A fashion designer who had dressed First Lady Michelle Obama posted an open letter vowing that she would never dress the new First Lady, Melania Trump. It's a good thing for her, Mrs. Trump never asked. At least they've cleared that up right front.

French fashion designer Sophie Theallet, whose design firm is based in New York City, is not one of the most well-known designers in the fashion industry. She did get some attention when she began dressing current First Lady Michelle Obama on a few occasions. Now with a new First Lady coming in, Theallet is tweeting a message: don't even ask, Melania.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Imagine if the designer for Melania said the reverse about Michelle. The cries of racism would be HUGE!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top