Easily better than any star wars movie since the 1980s.
It's not better than Force Awakens and I found Revenge of the Sith to be better.
As an individual movie, Revenge is actual good. Unfortunately, trilogies - or grouped story movies - impact one another.It's not better than Force Awakens and I found Revenge of the Sith to be better.
If Episode 1 hadn't been shit and Episode 2 hadn't been "better than 1..." then Revenge would've been really good. But it's weighed down. Like The Matrix... if 2 and 3 didn't exist, REALLY good. Unfortunately...
As good as Rogue One is perceived by many, it might be grouped in with the upcoming One-shot movies. Next May is Han Solo.
Back to the Future trilogy... worst one is merely considered the weakest of the 3, but still not a bad movie... good trilogy.
There's a new movie coming out this September called "Everybody Eats".
Below is the poster
Below is the poster
Bukafax-quality, man...There's a new movie coming out this September called "Everybody Eats".
Below is the poster
If not for the Sci-Gasm Podcast you would've destroyed all my respect for Australia.It's not better than Force Awakens and I found Revenge of the Sith to be better.
LotR were New Zealand... hate away!If not for the Sci-Gasm Podcast you would've destroyed all my respect for Australia.
It is getting killed on reviews. Actual audience seems to like it a little better than the reviews though.New King Arthur wasn't bad
2016 Ghostbusters outed many reviewers that gave it a good review. Proved they were either shills promoting that company or were swayed by anything other than "how was the actual movie".It is getting killed on reviews. Actual audience seems to like it a little better than the reviews though.
2016 Ghostbusters outed many reviewers that gave it a good review. Proved they were either shills promoting that company or were swayed by anything other than "how was the actual movie".
Well that and there is societal pressure to like that new Ghostbusters movie. Based on something you said, I looked up the controversy over what AVGN, aka @Fry, said about the movie. It was really overblown.
I remember a similar situation years back with The Price of Egypt. This old guy who did movie reviews on TV was hard on it, making fun of some parts and being sarcastic. It was his shtick and he had reviewed hundreds of movies the same way. Even attacking popular movies. But ridiculing The Prince of Egypt caused some big controversy.
Did the image not show up?
nope
View attachment 10656
It's a photoshopped picture of the Past and Present Titans in a Roman Empire setting.
It's a photoshopped picture of the Past and Present Titans in a Roman Empire setting.
I'm sure it is, there were probably 20 people in the theater all togetherIt is getting killed on reviews. Actual audience seems to like it a little better than the reviews though.
But it was actually a good flick
View attachment 10656
It's a photoshopped picture of the Past and Present Titans in a Roman Empire setting.
Did you do that?
Did you do that?
No. I saw it online this morning. It was titled was Titans Everybody Eats.
Since every alt right snowflake cuck claimed that 2016 Ghostbusters was some sort of poltical feminazi propaganda and PC movement instead of four women paying homage, I'll go ahead and assert that King Arthur is small penis compensation propaganda for emasculated, closeted white European males. Totally fair.
King Arthur cost $175M to make and brings in $14.7M opening day. Wow.
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/king-a...-million-debut-behind-snatched-150844037.html
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/king-a...-million-debut-behind-snatched-150844037.html
Some of these movies are just such easy flop calls. It's kind of amazing the studios don't get it.King Arthur cost $175M to make and brings in $14.7M opening day. Wow.
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/king-a...-million-debut-behind-snatched-150844037.html
- Status
- Not open for further replies.