Come on Ben. You can kill the Ravens and the colts with one kick here.
This is no lose territory. 2-3 are likely done very shortly here.
A missed FG to end as a tie eliminating both Ratbirds and Pitt would be awesome too.
A missed FG to end as a tie eliminating both Ratbirds and Pitt would be awesome too.
Let’s go chargers
Want the tie so the Steelers are eliminated
Going to be a great episode I think
You guys are confused colts just clinched unless the bolts and Raiders tie I think
Nope, Colts are eliminated. Steelers are basically in (unless the Chargers and Raiders tie), and regardless of who wins, Raiders and Chargers will have 10 wins.
You also said we would crush the Texans too..
You just can’t give me one can you ? Just one…. Just say yea man you were right about them Colts.
But it was over by halftime. I can’t help they got vanilla and let that scrub team back in it. They did what they needed to do when they needed to. But I hate playing not to lose.
Raiders beat the Steelers so they would win tie breaker.Want the tie so the Steelers are eliminated
Chargers loss eliminates them for pit.
Do I understand correctly that if the Raiders and Chargers tie, they both go in?
Two offenses. Taking knees then punting.
Two offenses. Taking knees then punting.
Raiders beat the Steelers so they would win tie breaker.
Chargers loss eliminates them for pit.
If Raiders lose, they finish 9-8. Steelers are 9-7-1, so they would get 7th seed I think
No. If they’re tie, Steelers beat chargers in tie breaker as they also have a tie.Do I understand correctly that if the Raiders and Chargers tie, they both go in?
Two offenses. Taking knees then punting.
Chargers win over raiders eliminates Steelers.
The other way around and the Steelers are in, chargers out.
I think that’s right, but that would mean Steelers clinched.If Raiders lose, they finish 9-8. Steelers are 9-7-1, so they would get 6th seed I think
How could they miss out?
A tie puts all three at 9-7-1. And Steelers would have better conference record than LA.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.