TitanJeff said:Which one is Overalls?
Yes That is a picture of me and Antwan Peek at the Texans Draft Party last year.
Sledge said:
Try harder next time. May be join the smack pretenders for practice. Also I am sorry that I defended my team and threw a wrench in that weak smack post, but please keep the smack in the smack forum. My warning level was raised today.
Don't worry Overalls dude... You still have another 70-80 percent to burn through. You will be fine... Still waiting for those predictions Hoss.
:thumb:
:thumb:
Overalls said:
what I find useless is how you keep shooting me down on a personal level, and your futile attempts are filled with nothing but :banned:
try being a little constructive next time and we might be able to have a conversation one day that doesn't turn into one of your childish personal attacks. If you're into that, my 12-year old cousin can set you up.
by being a little constructive I don't mean tell me your line will give up 20 less sacks cuz you drafted two linemen in the 3rd round. we drafted linemen last year and our line did not give up 20 less sacks, and we had a mobile QB.
so learn the game a little, and get back to me when you start making more sense.
Offensive linemen take some time to develop into productive starters that play at a high level. They as draft picks IMO do not contribute immediately like a WR may. It is a good sign if you are a Texans fan if your team is spending good picks at those postions... still... offensive lineman are like scotch whiskey... other positions are more like beer. ramble ramble ramble...
SEC 330 BIPOLAR said:
O-line rookies are also greatly helped by quality vets who know how to block. You could draft 5 rookies on your line all in the first round and it would mean little to nothing if they do not know the tricks that the D uses to get by you. Who out of your 68 sack O-line is going to be that mentor or the person to step there game up to the next level?
Sledge said:
I made sense. It was your post that started trying to turn this into a smack thread. I like your post statement about being constructive, but don't use any reasons to do so.
How about this one. Your mobile QB had less rushing yards than David Carr last year
Steve McNair attemps 32, yards 139, avg. 4.3, TDS 1
David Carr attemps 56, yards 308, avg. 5.5. TDS 1
And guess what your teams mobile QB had less yards than David Carr year before last and the year before that.
Is that constructive enough for your post.
bigtitan53279 said:
my thoughts exactly. If you design a play for Carr to roll out and scramble, he either loses yards or teeth
Overalls said:
Please do not tell me you are comparing Carr to the CoMVP of the year in 2003.
The same Carr with a 69.5 QB Rating. Your right he was a better RB that year than QB, but it looks like he was a better door mat as well.
The only way the Texans do well will be monster defensive performances...
If the texans give up more than 21 points they will lose 90% of the time.
That's a prediction.
If the texans give up more than 21 points they will lose 90% of the time.
That's a prediction.
BlazingArrow#9 said:
I was solely stating that Carr had more rushing yards than McNair because one of your fellow posters implied that Carr was not a mobile QB.
You do realize that Tim Couch and David Carr have very similar career numbers do you not?
Tim Couch
David Carr
Because of the absurd number of fumbels, lack of TD production and QB rating I would give the nod to Couch but I guess it is arguable.
Averaging 52 sacks a season does not show much mobility. McNair did not run as much as he use to because he is older and knows that you do not need to run on every play to keep it alive. The threat that you might run creates enough opportunities not to have to run.
Tim Couch
David Carr
Because of the absurd number of fumbels, lack of TD production and QB rating I would give the nod to Couch but I guess it is arguable.
Averaging 52 sacks a season does not show much mobility. McNair did not run as much as he use to because he is older and knows that you do not need to run on every play to keep it alive. The threat that you might run creates enough opportunities not to have to run.
rushing numbers are not as good for Couch as they are for Carr. Thanks for not paying attention to my post topic.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
