For the sake of all of our sanity, we gotta stop posting in this thread lol
JRob throwing cover for Tanne.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...uation-over-one-game-isnt-fair-to-any-player/
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...uation-over-one-game-isnt-fair-to-any-player/
Well how about 2 games ? Both playoff games! Cmon man! I’m not even counting the AFCCC .
Yep it goes deeper than one game..but what else are they going to say? They are tied to Tannehill for the next 1-2 yrs
I doubt its nefarious just lack of enforcable standards... one guys perfect centering is another guys 55-45... one guy sees scuffed gloss another dont
My understanding cards are supposed to be put under blue light looking for scratches and more importantly people doing shady shyt like trimming edges and such
IMO there is a business opportunity for someone to publish known standards and adhere to them plus authentication. So like instead of subjective things state what perfect centering is for each card ... even borderless. state damage noticed and authenticate card as genuine. So a grade of Genuine Undamaged Centered... hell forget centering... just Genuine and note damage
problem would be getting known samples to compare with for authentication.... I mean it would be doable
i rated this cheers as I am drinking strong stuff thinking about that lol
So I was skipping through channels, NFL Network had our game on (was end of game), and I turned it on. Wasn’t our game, but Horseface and the Colts 3 and goal from the 1 with 13 seconds left against the Patriots! They failed! So nice to watch that again.
On a trip to St Louis we caught a Cardinals game, a buddy got talking to the security guard and he got us in to get pics with the trophy. Not a big baseball fan but that was pretty cool
I know everyone wants to say we choked and gave the game away to the Cincy, but I’m not so sure after seeing the second half adjustments Cincy made against Maholmes and company. They’re a good team, fix that o-line and they’re an elite team. Even if they both made mistakes, the difference between Tannehill and Burrow is Tannehill looked like a frightened rookie (was even running scared that cost us at least 2 first down’s) where the stage was too big. While Burrow looked like the seasoned veteran with ice in his veins and never looked scared even after getting sacked 9 times.
I honestly can’t even say we would beat them in a rematch. It’s about time we give them some credit.
I honestly can’t even say we would beat them in a rematch. It’s about time we give them some credit.
We gave that game away!
F the Bengals
I don’t have to watch the game against the chiefs to see what the titans did to give the game away. What the chiefs game was, was the chiefs game.
No, Tannehill gave them enough.
Turnovers were the outlier. It resulted in giving them points on the board and stopped us from putting points on the board.
No denying the Bengals are a good team, but we were the #1 seed, at home, the D played awesome, the offense choked
How our FG went to chit is beyond my understanding. 52 yard field goal with how our D was playing should be a go 100
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
