Beat the pants off of them and then trade for Tee Higgins on Monday
Beat the pants off of them and then trade for Tee Higgins on Monday
Higgins? The same guy who couldn’t catch a cold let alone the football on Monday night? Sure, he’d fit right in with this franchise!
Beat the pants off of them and then trade for Tee Higgins on Monday
How's he in pass protection?
QB Joe Burrow (calf) was listed as a full participant in Wednesday's practice estimation.
Why not ...
Why not ...
Aren’t the Browns the elves? Didn’t they just beat our a$$?
please don’t play them again this week.
id much rather beat on some striped kitties.
please don’t play them again this week.
id much rather beat on some striped kitties.
Back to back 1000 yd seasons...yep he sucksHiggins? The same guy who couldn’t catch a cold let alone the football on Monday night? Sure, he’d fit right in with this franchise!
Back to back 1000 yd seasons...yep he sucks
Lol I got him in fantasy so I may be a little bitter … that’s back to back with Burrow ; wouldn’t be expecting that in Tennessee his numbers would be down across the board - but I I’m half joking - we need more WR talent so won’t argue
I actually think we match up decently against the Bengals. Watson slipped out of a bunch of sacks, a hobbled Burrow won't be doing that. We'll see if the offense can hold up its end of the deal.
I actually think we match up decently against the Bengals. Watson slipped out of a bunch of sacks, a hobbled Burrow won't be doing that. We'll see if the offense can hold up its end of the deal.
Yup agree. Could definitely be a sack fest again on Burrow. I don't think the Rams took full advantage of blitzing Burrow up the middle Monday night. Yeah Donald was able to destroy the interior by himself, but the Rams should have went full Buddy Ryan blitz play after play, since Burrow looked like a statue.
Hendrickson scares me coming off the edge though. We did nothing to max protect against Garrett and it's going to be a long day if we leave Hendrickson one on one with the dud Dillard all day long. This matchup will show me how bad coaching really is if we don't make the adjustment to give Dillard help to slow down Hendrickson.
You guys pronounce "Roughing the Passer" phunny.
Refs are going to be On Point this Sunday.
Refs are going to be On Point this Sunday.
Can someone edit the thread title lol, should be cats or something. I dont think we matchup well at all, has everyone forgot how off ball our secondary plays and how often teams with a good passing game torch us. Hope we win, probably wont be as ugly as last week but not expecting much. Not with this offense
dillard will be fine what with all the pointers the brownies gave him post game and allYup agree. Could definitely be a sack fest again on Burrow. I don't think the Rams took full advantage of blitzing Burrow up the middle Monday night. Yeah Donald was able to destroy the interior by himself, but the Rams should have went full Buddy Ryan blitz play after play, since Burrow looked like a statue.
Hendrickson scares me coming off the edge though. We did nothing to max protect against Garrett and it's going to be a long day if we leave Hendrickson one on one with the dud Dillard all day long. This matchup will show me how bad coaching really is if we don't make the adjustment to give Dillard help to slow down Hendrickson.
Yeah, 'cause if we sack Burrow a bunch of times this should be an easy win.... wait.
People really forget how impressively the titans had to be to blow that game against the bengals.
9 sacks, 3 TO, sure.
but take the history of the NFL, there are little to zero instances in which a tie game AND the ball with :20 left results in a regulation loss.
Now add that the INT was also taken on the opposing side of the field.
I mention this only because of the casual nature people compare the game hypothetically to future possible games like it was some fairly common or casual occurrence.
that was a freak of nature ending. And a very titans thing to happen.
9 sacks, 3 TO, sure.
but take the history of the NFL, there are little to zero instances in which a tie game AND the ball with :20 left results in a regulation loss.
Now add that the INT was also taken on the opposing side of the field.
I mention this only because of the casual nature people compare the game hypothetically to future possible games like it was some fairly common or casual occurrence.
that was a freak of nature ending. And a very titans thing to happen.
Last edited by a moderator:
People really forget how impressively the titans had to be to blow that game against the bengals.
9 sacks, 3 TO, sure.
but take the history of the NFL, there are little to zero instances in which a tie game AND the ball with :20 left results in a regulation loss.
Now add that the INT was also taken on the opposing side of the field.
I mention this only because of the casual nature people compare the game hypothetically to future possible games like it was some fairly common or casual occurrence.
that was a freak of nature ending. And a very titans thing to happen.
A very Titan thing to happen indeed ...
Maybe if our coach tried to win games instead of not losing them we could have won.People really forget how impressively the titans had to be to blow that game against the bengals.
9 sacks, 3 TO, sure.
but take the history of the NFL, there are little to zero instances in which a tie game AND the ball with :20 left results in a regulation loss.
Now add that the INT was also taken on the opposing side of the field.
I mention this only because of the casual nature people compare the game hypothetically to future possible games like it was some fairly common or casual occurrence.
that was a freak of nature ending. And a very titans thing to happen.
Also why is this thread the elves? That was the Browns lol
Maybe if our coach tried to win games instead of not losing them we could have won.
Also why is this thread the elves? That was the Browns lol
Just a dumb way of saying Bengals (Bang elves)
- Status
- Not open for further replies.