And to think, actually a few people on here are saying that Jon Robinson sucks and should be on the hot seat or “has to go”…lol.
Good thing those people are just armchair GMs, otherwise we’d still be lucky to be a 1-2 win team.
We’re lucky to have him, and Vrabel. Are they perfect, no. But it sure beats the dark days of just a few years ago by a mile!
https://titansized.com/2021/12/03/tennessee-titans-jon-robinson-elite/
Good thing those people are just armchair GMs, otherwise we’d still be lucky to be a 1-2 win team.
We’re lucky to have him, and Vrabel. Are they perfect, no. But it sure beats the dark days of just a few years ago by a mile!
https://titansized.com/2021/12/03/tennessee-titans-jon-robinson-elite/
How many more 1st round picks is he going to use on the OL until it's actually good? 2022 1st rd pick will be OL I am sure.
Their is much more to being a solid GM than just the draft.
I think that wins and losses are the true measuring stick for a GM and since he has been in charge we are doing just fine in that category.
Robinson has made some good moves and some questionable ones like many GMs..but elite?
Where is there to go from "elite"?
Where is there to go from "elite"?
Reminds me of the company I work for when they say something looks more “premium”.
He has the close to the same wins per season average in his first 5 years as Mike Reinfeldt. Just saying.
Exactly…does he create a roster that can win consistently. If yes, it doesn’t matter how he gets there.
Look at trajectory man. Reinfeldts first two years he won 23 games—wonder how many of those were because of Albert Hanesworth dominating the middle. He inherited a solid roster and then turned it into dog shit. JR inherited dog shit and turned it into an excellent roster.
Reinfeldt took over a much better team than what JRob inherited. JRob already has produced more winning seasons though. And a deeper playoff run.
How's he done the last 3 years in getting a reliable kicker?
Especially when describing Robinson
Maybe he should trade out more and gain some picks in rounds he's better at.
Fixed it for you.
He inherited a team coming of an 8-8 and 4-12 season. So by your reasoning he must have been awesome in turning it around.
Robinson also inherited a bad record but he he didn’t get past 9-7 until his fourth year.
I’m not saying Reinfeldt was better than Robinson or even good. Just that measuring GMs on wins isn’t a good indicator. A good coach can make a bad GM look good and a bad coach can make a good GM look bad.
To your point, anyone done better on the later rounds? I’d say no
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
