it may sound crazy but i dont really think we should get law... he may still have some game but how old is he... he dosent have that many years left.. we should have gone after woodsen but now thats too late
we need a veteran DB like ty law to come in. It would sure up a few things. I think our defense would look good with Law. Ty Law, Bulluck, Vadan Bosch, Haynesworth, Sirmon, Thorton and Chris Hope at saftey.
I'd much rather have law than woodson. He's only two years older, and has a much better history. In the last 5 years, woodson's best year he had 3 INTs. Law has only had one year with fewer than three. Woodson has had one year in the last four with over 5 passes defended. Law has only had one in the last four with less, and that was the year he was injured and only played 7 games. True, I wouldn't sign Law up for a very long deal, but he can still play. I'd love to get him if we can make it work with the cap.
This would be a great pick up if the price is right. It might even propel the D into the top ten in the league.
Ty Law can add something to the defense, if he's not too pricy, no point in releasing a player who wants a lot of money and then buying a player that would want a lot as well
No one should forgot the Schwartz Effect!!!
No one should forgot the Schwartz Effect!!!
I haven't heard anything. I thought Law was supposed to visit this week. What's up?
I believe the visit was canceled or at least postponed until Mac's situation is clearer.
for some reason, i don't think ty law is coming to visit, because it was supposed to be this week......and he hasn't flew in yet.....hmmmm, maybe just maybe bus n reese have worked out a contract, thats what im thinking...
Latest word is that the Chiefs have the inside track on Law right now but I think he's far from a "done deal" with anyone.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.