have to put someone at KR1
At least it isn't haskins
I wonder if our first Depth Charts are put together the same as Minny
Vikings HC Kevin O'Connell: 'I would not overevaluate' first depth chart
Vikings HC Kevin O'Connell: 'I would not overevaluate' first depth chart
I wonder if our first Depth Charts are put together the same as Minny
Vikings HC Kevin O'Connell: 'I would not overevaluate' first depth chart
Almost certainly
From what I understand they are put together by the media guy in the front office
Do you really think Vrabel would release his real depth chart?
Get rid of one of those RBs and bring back Tory Carter. Dude wasn't the most precise, but even when he missed, he missed at full force.Mack has impressed in camp per Twitter but Rader might make more sense since he played a hybrid TE/FB role last year and we don’t have a FB in camp.
I think Dowell was always intended to be a project.
Chig said today they’re working him at FB. Last year they used Rader at FB some too. Easier to use a TE as your FB to free up a roster spot. Now they just gotta teach Brewer how to long snap lol.
Chig said today they’re working him at FB. Last year they used Rader at FB some too. Easier to use a TE as your FB to free up a roster spot. Now they just gotta teach Brewer how to long snap lol.
That's what they used to call an H back. A hybrid TE, FB and Slot receiver. Wycheck was a textbook H back
Just thrown together by someone with no real thought. Everyone should know these depth charts mean nothing.I wonder if our first Depth Charts are put together the same as Minny
Vikings HC Kevin O'Connell: 'I would not overevaluate' first depth chart
I would think they will use Chig at WR as well to take some advantages.Chig said today they’re working him at FB. Last year they used Rader at FB some too. Easier to use a TE as your FB to free up a roster spot. Now they just gotta teach Brewer how to long snap lol.
Chig has always looked like a WR to me. He doesn't even look big enough to play TE, much less FB. I'd use a MLB to play FB. They know how to hit the gaps and take a collision.
if they aint gonna handle the rock makes sense... but hardly ever see it in nfl
7 receivers and 4 running backs? That seems unlikely, especially at WR given the offensive philosophy. The team definitely isn't limiting themselves to 8 defensive backs. Dowell is that late round WR that this fan base enamors themselves with and always amounts to a dud. If anyone surprises people at that position it will be Roberson.
Last year the Titans entered the season with 5 running backs and 5 wide receivers. I could definitely see them carrying an extra WR or 2 this year.7 receivers and 4 running backs? That seems unlikely, especially at WR given the offensive philosophy. The team definitely isn't limiting themselves to 8 defensive backs. Dowell is that late round WR that this fan base enamors themselves with and always amounts to a dud. If anyone surprises people at that position it will be Roberson.
5 RBs is stupid
Guess the philosophy is paying 5 RBs $1 is better than paying 1 RB $5.
I would be fine with that to be honest... but clearly the OC/vrable disagree
7 receivers and 4 running backs? That seems unlikely, especially at WR given the offensive philosophy. The team definitely isn't limiting themselves to 8 defensive backs. Dowell is that late round WR that this fan base enamors themselves with and always amounts to a dud. If anyone surprises people at that position it will be Roberson.
10 DBs minimum
IDK why people think 7 WR when there are only 3 or 4 who are NFL caliber: Burks, Hopkins, NWI (low caliber but still NFL level) and probably Phillips too if he can stay healthy.
I would be surprised to see them keep less than 10 DBs. You can never have enough good DBs. They get used a lot and are the core special teams group.
5 RBs is stupid
One was a fullback which these days is more TE than RB. Other than Kyle (with the polish last name) in SF NFL FBs only exist to block. Basically a TE who lines up in the backfield
- Status
- Not open for further replies.