We know the name is changing, but I keep seeing that there has been some really bad stuff going on and that a big story is breaking soon that will cause some major changes for ownership etc.
Here are some examples:
View attachment 17616 View attachment 17617 View attachment 17618
View attachment 17619
Here are some examples:
View attachment 17616 View attachment 17617 View attachment 17618
View attachment 17619
Last edited by a moderator:
It’s likely people caring about making their cheerleaders sex slaves a few years ago.
So the name and logo change for racial/social reasons is merely slight of hand for the media and general population to distract form deeper issues. Classic move.
If true... F em all.
If true... F em all.
Not sure whos gonna buy those shares of ownership, Snyder is known to meddle with the football operations and not in a good way.
That franchise is a mess
That franchise is a mess
Getting pretty annoyed by this media tactic of announcing something is going to be announced. (separate topic entirely, but consider the Ghisaile(sp?) Maxwell story).
Essentially, all these "sources" have a giant nothing burger currently but are now trying to suck in the viewers pre-emptively to continue following them until they have a story. so F the media folks on this one first.
As far as the actual story, I'm interested in finding out the details. Sounds interesting but I have my doubts that we'll hear any of the real details anytime soon. The Josh Norman tweet seems kind of b***h move too. either say it or don't. being super cryptic is really of no help in the situation at all except to give himself attention.
Essentially, all these "sources" have a giant nothing burger currently but are now trying to suck in the viewers pre-emptively to continue following them until they have a story. so F the media folks on this one first.
As far as the actual story, I'm interested in finding out the details. Sounds interesting but I have my doubts that we'll hear any of the real details anytime soon. The Josh Norman tweet seems kind of b***h move too. either say it or don't. being super cryptic is really of no help in the situation at all except to give himself attention.
Selling may be his only option? what a mess Washington is right now
Phillips: Barring a dramatic change, Dan Snyder must sell the Washington NFL franchise
Maybe Mark Cuban will buy it
Phillips: Barring a dramatic change, Dan Snyder must sell the Washington NFL franchise
Maybe Mark Cuban will buy it
I think calling it the Washington Football Team or Club is probably the best name right now. With everything else going on its inclusive, neutral and won't offend anyone.
I bet he doesn’t sell and the owners won’t force him to.Selling may be his only option? what a mess Washington is right now
Phillips: Barring a dramatic change, Dan Snyder must sell the Washington NFL franchise
Maybe Mark Cuban will buy it
Doesn't seem so...they should..same as the Jerry Richardson situationI bet he doesn’t sell and the owners won’t force him to.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/07/17/nfl-calls-allegations-against-redskins-officials-serious-disturbing-contrary-leagues-values/?outputType=amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost...e-dan-snyder-to-sell-washington-redskins/amp/
The main difference is that Richardson was personally accused and Snyder was not.
The main difference is Richardson was personally accused of wrong doing and Snyder was not.
Doesn't seem so...they should..same as the Jerry Richardson situation
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/07/17/nfl-calls-allegations-against-redskins-officials-serious-disturbing-contrary-leagues-values/?outputType=amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost...e-dan-snyder-to-sell-washington-redskins/amp/
The main difference is Richardson was personally accused of wrong doing and Snyder was not.
True but Synder is the owner, it reflects poorly on him and as the owner he had to of been aware of it, he meddles in everything else.The main difference is that Richardson was personally accused and Snyder was not.
The main difference is Richardson was personally accused of wrong doing and Snyder was not.
That is very true, but it’s why there was no discussion about Richardson as he was an assailant. Knowing and participating are two drastically different things. Not excusing Snyder and hope he goes, but I think it unlikely.
Joe Paterno would probably say otherwise about "knowing" and participating.That is very true, but it’s why there was no discussion about Richardson as he was an assailant. Knowing and participating are two drastically different things. Not excusing Snyder and hope he goes, but I think it unlikely.
That is still the biggest wtf case about football I have ever heard.Joe Paterno would probably say otherwise about "knowing" and participating.
Yeah, they shoulda made Joe sell Penn St.Joe Paterno would probably say otherwise about "knowing" and participating.
In honour of the nations forefathers and keeping the tradition for the fan base of Skins...rename them "Foreskins"
That's my nickname for them, Cleveland is shyte stains, and my wife calls the Jets the Juggs I don't really get that one.In honour of the nations forefathers and keeping the tradition for the fan base of Skins...rename them "Foreskins"
They needed a name to take the wrap, Paterno was the biggest name. Aside from Sandusky himself, there were more guilty parties. But without looking it up, I'm sure I'm far from the only one who can't remember those other names today.Yeah, they shoulda made Joe sell Penn St.
Former Titan on Time With Washington: 'Most Miserable Experience of my Life' | Sports Illustrated Tennessee Titans News, Analysis and More
Crazy how things are with that team.
Crazy how things are with that team.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.