like @8and8 said
make it a 3 year thing, start off .3, .6 then 3rd year do the full point or something that route
I say starting rosters should be upped to 3 defenses and 3 kickers.
I’m ok either way on the PPR.
I’m ok either way on the PPR.
I like the PPR format, it really adds value to middle of the pack RBs. Makes lesser players more competitive and creates more parity.
it absolutely does but in a dynasty format it changes whole team dynamics. Hard to press that onto teams that’s guilts specifically with standard scoring in mind.
We are already committed to smaller rosters right clark?
there’s a big cut looming this offseason. Not exactly what fry is wanting tho.
I much prefer half point PPR and honestly don't really see it as some big unfair change. I've personally never passed on drafting/acquiring someone I otherwise would have "because standard scoring." Or vice versa. It's just never really factored into the equation very much for me. Perhaps for others it has though. So, I get why some might gripe about it. If it was gonna cause drama (which it sounds like it would) I'd probably just vote to keep things the way they are.
Last edited by a moderator:
.5 point ppr is probably the best middle ground if it was going to come to vote
I'm cool either way tbh. The biggest pro in favor of the change imo is the bump to mid/lower tier RBs Dee mentioned. Finding startable RBs in this league can be pretty brutal.
I’m fine with half point PPR, but I think a decent amount would agree that full PPR is too much to change in an off season.
Ftr all my comments were assuming dee was talking half point ppr. Full pt is def too radical of a change to make all of a sudden.
I’ve never done a PPR league, and I agree, a full point seems excessive
what do you care!?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
