You tell me, who's better: Leinart(MVP) Young(National Champion) or Cutler( His biggest accomplishment was beating UT)
Cutler and Leinart in just about a dead heat. But I'll say Cutler...
Starkiller said:
I like em' all, though I have evidence supporting all parties: Cutler has lived through college with virtually no offensive line, sure he developed some bad habits, those can be fixed, but he has a medal of honor coming in the NFL, he'll be used to the rush, while Leinart, the little sissy-boy has been sittin' back in his pocket with the best o-line in the league for 10 seconds or more, he's not fit for the kind of rush the NFL has.
Spinnaker said:
This is an impossible question to answer at this time. Leinart MVP on an offense that will have 4 first rounders this season. Young, great athlete but how that will translate to the NFL is in question, and Cutler a guy that seems to have all the tools, but played with mediocre talent.
Its like asking whose better 6 years ago (or whenever it was) Couch, Smith, Mcnabb, Culpepper, McCown. Well, 2 of the 5 worked out, the others sucked ***. At this point, there is nothing to indicate how good any of these guys will be. Heismans and national championships and beating UT are great in college, they mean nothing in the NFL.
Starkiller said:
I agree. Cutler has a stronger arm and is more mobile, two attributes that will be very important in the NFL. Edge to Cutler but I wouldn't complain if we drafted Leinart either.
:helmet: McNair wants Young
:chuck: Chow wants Leinart
:homer2: Homers want Cutler
I'll go with Coach. I don't have a Tenn./Vandy bias. :kiss:
:chuck: Chow wants Leinart
:homer2: Homers want Cutler
I'll go with Coach. I don't have a Tenn./Vandy bias. :kiss:
I want Culter and living in Pasadena, I have seen Leinart a lot. Just don't trust his arm that much.
He's impressing me, but I'm still not sold at #3. In a trade down, sure. I think the QB landscape will change again before the draft, though.
Sure, why not? If he is considered a franchise QB, then absolutely.TitanJeff said:
Problem is I don't think we have much leverage to trade down. I just don't see the player that the Packers, Bills or 9'ers would trade up for, and I wouldn't risk trading behind Raiders AND Lions/Cardinals.
To answer the question, would I draft Cutler at #3? Just as much as I would draft Leinart at #3 ;-)
Oh and Brian, you must know Chow pretty well to know that he wants Leinart over the other 2. Maybe he's drooling at having a hypermobile QB for once...
To answer the question, would I draft Cutler at #3? Just as much as I would draft Leinart at #3 ;-)
Oh and Brian, you must know Chow pretty well to know that he wants Leinart over the other 2. Maybe he's drooling at having a hypermobile QB for once...
I don't like the word reach. It makes it appear as if there's some kind of 100% objective ranking of players, which I contend there is not. If Titans have Cutler or Leinart as the #1 player on their board, is it a reach, because for instance Kiper has them lower? Who decides which "board" is the correct one?
Vince......Vince....Vince.....a week after the national championship everybody was excited about him. All the sudden Cutler this Cutler that. Now Lienart seems to be the front runner. It seems to change every week. I don't care which one we get as long he is a player that we can build our program around.
I'll take Leinhart. I think he's closer than the other guys are to being ready to play in the NFL, plus, he's damn good under preasure and he's used winning. You can't teach that. Not that Young isn't used to winning, I just don't want another running QB. I Leinhart isn't there I'd like to see us get Cutler.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
