Finishing 7th is not better than finishing 2nd
Yes agree. Just a tricky question.
In fairness, receding each round is relatively new. Can’t recall the actual year it started, but if I recall it was late 2000’s, maybe even 2010.C'mon Aqutis30, surely you know this
I’m the one that blew that for us…. I took the +7 in Vegas…. Still with the feels
A lot of different scenarios. They would have to beat the Bengals in Cincinnati. Honestly don’t think that will happen. You could also have an upset in the other games. The only guarantee is that we won’t play the Chiefs or Bills in our first game.
They are the 6 seed. Steelers aren't beating the Chiefs. It's Pats or Chargers.
Last edited by a moderator:
Cincy plays NE if things stay the way they are now? I think Cincy beats NE
I would not want to see the Titans play the Bengals with their passing attack.
NE should be 5 @ bengals with chargers win, 6 @ bills with Raiders win
I may be missing a tie breaker for Raiders where NE has them beat as well which would lock them at 5.
Do you remember that time when the colts needed a win to go to the playoffs against the league’s worst, Jaguars and on 4th and goal, they handed off to MVP hopeful, Jonathan Taylor and he was stuffed?
Raiders will be the 5th seed with a win
I know theyd both be 8-4 conf record but didn’t look to see tie breaker after.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
