This makes absolutely no sense. So you can't disagree with what happened but also not agree with the "other" idea.
I never said the Wilson pick was "OK". Show me the post that says that. I can easily name a better pick at the time (Fulton, Johnson, Diggs), but when you say it should have been an EDGE player I'm asking who should have been taken there. What rookie edge player would you be happy their production as a first round pick. Because thats the arguement. We should have drafted an edge player in the first instead of Clowney. I'm asking who you would have taken instead. Not saying there was no one better than Wilson (because his lazy azz just practiced the whole week for the first time as a Titan).
Also show me where it doesn't negatively reflect on JRob? You are just making stuff up lol I never said that. This might be his biggest whiff in the draft. It was a horrible pick. I'd be surprised if he ever plays a down for us. But if you are arguing we should have taken an edge player instead of signing Clowney I want to know who you would have taken instead of Wilson there. You still haven't answered that question...
I’m tired of arguing. You’ve answered that question yourself. Take ANY edge rusher (YGM, whosoever) if you are supporting that Wilson may have been the biggest “whiff” in the draft. You’re evaluating retrospectively, like I pointed out . It rationalizes the quality of the pick- not the player. Hey- we disagree. I’m over it. I’ve got to work.
Hi would say y’all are wasting your time, but the fact this is basically over Wilson should be enough....
It's not a comparison of Wilson vs the edge player its the edge player vs Clowney. Maybe you missed that comment, but that's what I replied to before you decided to step in.
thts more than beasley
Which is why he was released.
why they cutting him?
He was trying to get traded before the deadline, and called the team clowns on twitter for not trading him. They fined and suspended him. He continued to run his mouth and they cut him.
My understanding is that he and Beasley are planning to open a finishing school for young ladies.
Definitely not the type of person you want playing on a team.. any team.
so tell me again how that correlates to building a draft propsect, in Yetur Gross Matos?
Beasley has been in the league for a veteran amount of time..
Throw Adorable in there with em......
I guess you aren’t keeping up with the conversation. Maybe go back and read the posts before responding? No one is talking about Beasley.
The poster I responded to said he would rather have a edge player than Clowney. You are the only one talking about a guy no longer on the team.
Doubt JRob gonna stick his hand in that box again....
Plus the guy has underperformed his whole career. It’s funny how so many posters don’t even look a performance when they start the sign this guy train rolling.
ATL fans down here don’t hate him, and largely blame Quinn for a lot of defensive failures.
Takk however, went about this exactly the wrong way. Even *if* JRob was interested, you couldn’t go after him after the Beasley flop.
Takk however, went about this exactly the wrong way. Even *if* JRob was interested, you couldn’t go after him after the Beasley flop.
I’m putting ex-Falcon defenders in the same box as Clemson defenders. And then, I am probably gonna drop that box in the river.
I’d be happy if Clowney came back and rotated in with Landry and Roberson, but let’s be real, Roberson was the MUCH better player out there this week. I know it was a makeshift Bears OL, but he’s looked good for a minute now. I hope getting rid of Beastly improves the whole group.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
