Laserjock said:
Potential, cheap, 2 years to return to pre-injury form...if he ever lives up to expectations and we cut him, that's a carton of eggs on our face.
it doesnt hurt to keep him, he doesnt cost much at all and who knows, it may pay out.
Why would Lamont Thompson be a question mark? There are no veteran safeties on the team if both he and Tank Williams are let go. Why make a young and shaky secondary even younger and shakier?
If one safety has to go, the logical choice would be Williams since Thompson just signed a new contract last July. I honestly wish both guys could stay, however.
If one safety has to go, the logical choice would be Williams since Thompson just signed a new contract last July. I honestly wish both guys could stay, however.
elfinmagic53 said:
Why? Do you enjoy seeing them get ran over for TD's?
super_titan said:
The fact that people make it that far into the defense is NOT Tank or Lamont's fault. They were busy trying to do their jobs and also look out for the rookie corner's.
Perhaps if they weren't forced to play with 2 rookie corners, they would be able to stay in their slots and not get beat so bad in the backfield.
Because he has done nothing here and to keep him they'll have to give him a $1.275M base salary plus a $2.5M bonus. He ain't worth it...elfinmagic53 said:
Starkiller said:
And what would the alternative be? What veteran safety is already on the team and will do better in 2006? And exactly why hasn't he done anything here? Ummmm, maybe because he's trying to fill gaps that are left by the rookie corners!
LaMont sucks, he couldn't read a book let a lone a defense.
The alternative is obviously sign someone else or left Fuller play.
The alternative is obviously sign someone else or left Fuller play.
Gunny said:
Dang, ya'll some straight haters:irked: give some solid evidence that he can't read an OFFENSE, cause why would he need to read a Defense? I tell you what.....:sad2:
As I posted on another thread, he was just as bad the year before with 2 veterans at the corners.elfinmagic53 said:
Fuller should be our starting FS next year.
As for SS, we might have a hard time finding someone who is less effective than Tank has been over the last 3 years.
Gunny said:
Bah, not true. Besides, offense isn't supposed to be making it to the backfield. So there is a severe breakdown at the line of scrimmage for a person to even be in the backfield!:hmm:
Gunny said:
The corner should have that covered. The safety is the wingman on that play.
perhaps if they played Saftey they would be able to read run and attack the ball carrier - wait they do play saftey yet they were constant no shows in the run D. Rookie CB's to blame for sure.
elfinmagic53 said:
maybe I am old fashioned but I am sure the Free Safety always has to have the play in front of him, not behind him.
Gunny said:
Yeah, it's just you. I'm right. You're wrong. Now I gotta get going. Night Night.:kiss:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
