On the current roster after the necessary moves to draft him? Absolutely.
only one position matters in the end. *linkin park plays softly in the background*
Where are you getting an OL after trading draft capitol to get the 1st pick?
the real question is, why do you NOT want to upgrade our qb so badly when we so obviously have an average declining one? and we finally have a decent pick to actually do it.
you're obviously very upset by the idea, why? you think tanne is just very very good? im sure its not that, right?
P. I knew this already and you don’t have to tank for the GOAT.
It would take half of this year's draft and round 1+ of next year's draft.
again, we will have 125m+ next offseason to spend on whatever we want. OL obviously in the mix.
This is a debatable point. And as I said many, many times, you don’t need a top QB, you need an avg QB with low TO and a D.
THill, with an OL, is good enough. Not great, don’t need him to be, just Ned’s to be safe with the ball.
Goat?! Tf
We had Kern, then got Stonehouse. Both goat (at least of the league during their tenure but greatest of all season doesn’t really work as well).
Just to get this year's 1st overall pick, likely so.
he has the worst TO in the playoffs. Instantly sucks in your situation
it is not really debatable. he's average, everyone in the league agrees.. he had that one really good season. that was mostly just extreme TD variance (yardage still sucked). he's fine but he's nothing special and he's pushing 35 coming off ankle surgery. we're in a good spot with cap space coming up. i dont understand the crazy defensiveness.
you say all he needs is an OL. well we arent getting that this year. period. we dont have money and there arent enough actual good FAs anyways.
Last edited by a moderator:
Sure did. But that’s why one game doesn’t define a career. If anything, it’s the redemption factor people enjoy the most.
You can't get your entire OL and fill other needs, like WR, CB, C, K in FA on 125m.
Sure. That's how we wound up with the OL we currently have :biglaugh:
I think you’re misunderstanding “crazy defensiveness” for starters.
The argument has been about trading up to take one of two QBs. Neither are worth it. But I get it, ESPN has been saying for years QB is all that matters, you’ve bought in but reality is, they say things to get people to watch their talking heads. Surely you know this,
As far as THill, you did say average and declining. I don’t see anything to say declining. I don’t think he’s great either.
I think there’s a better chance at having a respectable OL this year than it is to get a “franchise QB”.
If the titans take a QB at 11, so be it. Which QB will it be? Maybe Levis, maybe Richardson but I think both have been ranked wild enough that 11 may be high for either. In any case, are either gonna be the “mahomes” you think we have to have to win? Probably not.
So the argument becomes, you must use an early draft pick to get a QB that must be a Mahomes to win a SB or else you’ll never win. At least that’s the case you’ve made.
So ya, I strongly disagree.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
