Bless your heart!He was good until Vrabel and his buttkisser position coaches started asking for crappy players. JRob gave them what they asked for, it is their fault they cannot evaluate/develop the players they asked for.
I tend to agree with thisHe was good until Vrabel and his buttkisser position coaches started asking for crappy players. JRob gave them what they asked for, it is their fault they cannot evaluate/develop the players they asked for.
View attachment 21258I tend to agree with this
Makes me wonder. Who outside Henry was drafted and developed into great/star player on this team in Vrabels time here? Simmons. Byard. Not many. Vrabel likes him some washed up vets and pillaging 1st round busts from other teams.He was good until Vrabel and his buttkisser position coaches started asking for crappy players. JRob gave them what they asked for, it is their fault they cannot evaluate/develop the players they asked for.
Henry was a Titan before Vrabel
Titan was a Vrabel before Henry
Huh?Titan was a Vrabel before Henry
Huh?
I'm bored at work.... lol
You got it bad.He was good until Vrabel and his buttkisser position coaches started asking for crappy players. JRob gave them what they asked for, it is their fault they cannot evaluate/develop the players they asked for.
Hes eyeing a cake across the room, he's full of emotions because things like that are not allowed in the house because is daughter is diabetic.
robinson totally goes for the off brand twinkies from the day old baker store... all that value
Little smooshed, no big deal. Getting those 1.50 twinkies for a quarter each is a can’t miss pick, especially when you only have $3.robinson totally goes for the off brand twinkies from the day old baker store... all that value
Damn, I didn't know we had that in common.robinson totally goes for the off brand twinkies from the day old baker store... all that value
I would fail easily here.
Valid concern, but realistically you still have to roll the dice and at least give it one more year.
Why's there 20 votes for "no and he shouldnt"?
What positives could you possibly see in having more years like the last 2
What positives could you possibly see in having more years like the last 2
Why's there 20 votes for "no and he shouldnt"?
What positives could you possibly see in having more years like the last 2
Friendly reminder to everyone that you can change your vote
It’s about 50/50 that he should be replaced, but half of those don’t think Ran/ AAS will do it.Why's there 20 votes for "no and he shouldnt"?
What positives could you possibly see in having more years like the last 2
But 20 said he should not be firedIt’s about 50/50 that he should be replaced, but half of those don’t think Ran/ AAS will do it.
Like wut
I said he should not be fired and I am one of the more vocal against Vrabel.But 20 said he should not be fired
Like wut
then what do you think is going to change from the last 2 years vs next year and beyond?I said he should not be fired and I am one of the more vocal against Vrabel.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.