My little big board @ 7
1. Harrison
2. Alt
3. Fashanu
4. Nabors
5. Odunze
6. Bowers
7.Trade down pick up a 3rd
1. Harrison
2. Alt
3. Fashanu
4. Nabors
5. Odunze
6. Bowers
7.Trade down pick up a 3rd
The Las Vegas Raiders have contacted the Titans about possibly moving up per Titanswire.
If given the choice of, for eample, the 1st/2nd best LT + the 10th-ish WR or the 2nd/3rd WR + 10th-ish LT, I'd probably prefer the 1st/2nd LT package. There's going to be some decent quality WR available at #38.
Report: Raiders exploring trading with Titans for No. 7 pick (msn.com)The Las Vegas Raiders have contacted the Titans about possibly moving up per Titanswire.
Hoping against this.
I’m all for the effort of picking up another couple picks, but I don’t think it’s wise to pass of Alt or Fashunu.
Hoping against this.
I’m all for the effort of picking up another couple picks, but I don’t think it’s wise to pass of Alt or Fashunu.
Fashunu will be there. I'm not really intrigued with him. Think he slides the closer we get to the draft.
Trading back with OAK is fine if we miss on our top guys of Alt, MHII, Nabers, and Fashanu. Some will say Odunze, but I don't agree.
But just know that if we do trade back, all we are likely to receive in return is 13, 44, and maybe pick 210. So, it's really not worth it unless we miss on those top 4 guys.
But just know that if we do trade back, all we are likely to receive in return is 13, 44, and maybe pick 210. So, it's really not worth it unless we miss on those top 4 guys.
Oakland doesn't have a pick in the entire draft, terrible trade partner lolTrading back with OAK is fine if we miss on our top guys of Alt, MHII, Nabers, and Fashanu. Some will say Odunze, but I don't agree.
But just know that if we do trade back, all we are likely to receive in return is 13, 44, and maybe pick 210. So, it's really not worth it unless we miss on those top 4 guys.
Oakland doesn't have a pick in the entire draft, terrible trade partner lol
Oops! Gotta get used to that.
If our LT is gone, it may be worth it. I would like to stay at 7 and get a studTrading back with OAK is fine if we miss on our top guys of Alt, MHII, Nabers, and Fashanu. Some will say Odunze, but I don't agree.
But just know that if we do trade back, all we are likely to receive in return is 13, 44, and maybe pick 210. So, it's really not worth it unless we miss on those top 4 guys.
So, would you take the No. 11 and No. 23 for the No. 7?
Yes absolutely! A 2nd 1st rounder to move back 4 spots must be a yes. This team is more than one pick away from being a contender. Let's say 4 of these 5 players are on the board at 7. You will be guaranteed to get one of them at 11 assuming Minnesota takes a QB plus another pick at 23. I am taking that all day long!!So, would you take the No. 11 and No. 23 for the No. 7?
4 of these 5 likely available at 7.
Alt
Fashanu
Nabers
Odunze
Bowers
That's a tough one... giving up Alt but Fashunu or Bowers at 11? Defense at 23?So, would you take the No. 11 and No. 23 for the No. 7?
That's a tough one... giving up Alt but Fashunu or Bowers at 11? Defense at 23?
Most likely Fashanu/Bowers/Odunze would be there at 11. Take one of them then at 23 Take WR or T depending what the pick at 11 was. Take Defense at 38 most likely DT or CB. This also gives us the chance to trade back again with the 23rd or 38th pick to try to pick up a 3rd rounder where we could use on whatever we don't take on Defense in the 2nd round.
Pick 23 Tackle Possiblilies:
Fuaga
Fautanu
Mims
Lathan
Guyton
Barton
WR Possibilities:
Thomas Jr
Leggett
Mitchelle
McConley
Last edited by a moderator:
There is zero chance they offer that to us. They got that pick so they can trade with AZ. The trade value works to get them a top 4 pick and they want to get ahead of the Giants.So, would you take the No. 11 and No. 23 for the No. 7?
I could however see us trading with AZ after that though. AZ will want to get up to 7 again to make sure they get one of the top 3 WR. Like when we moved back up to get Conklin. AZ has a TON of picks so they could offer us pick #11 and either a 2nd round pick or a 3rd and a 4th. I would happily move back to 11 and add a late 2nd or a 3rd and a 4th. Could still get a stud at 11.
So, would you take the No. 11 and No. 23 for the No. 7?
According to the standard trade value chart we would probably need to toss in our second to make that work.
2024 NFL Trade Value Chart
I get that the compensation is out of whack. I guess, I just asked to gauge what people value more; a top ten pick, or two first round picks. There are decent arguments for both.There is zero chance they offer that to us. They got that pick so they can trade with AZ. The trade value works to get them a top 4 pick and they want to get ahead of the Giants.
I could however see us trading with AZ after that though. AZ will want to get up to 7 again to make sure they get one of the top 3 WR. Like when we moved back up to get Conklin. AZ has a TON of picks so they could offer us pick #11 and either a 2nd round pick or a 3rd and a 4th. I would happily move back to 11 and add a late 2nd or a 3rd and a 4th. Could still get a stud at 11.
I would also think the position of need and the obvious race for a QB this year.I get that the compensation is out of whack. I guess, I just asked to gauge what people value more; a top ten pick, or two first round picks. There are decent arguments for both.
I believe that makes the #7 pick hold a little more weight than maybe the draft chart would suggest. At #7, might be fighting for that 4/5 QB before what appears to be a consensus large drop