Nintendo the GOATs.
Mario Odyssey has a 97 on metacritic. Zelda has that too. No company can release two 97 games in one year.
Mario Odyssey has a 97 on metacritic. Zelda has that too. No company can release two 97 games in one year.
i played the witcher for far too long last night... it sucks you in. and i feel like i havent explored shit yet
Wait until you try an explore all the islands around skellige lmao
i'm 8 hours in and am only level 5 still somehow. craziness
I'm probably 3 hours in and barely level 2. Granted I've spent a fair amount of time just roaming around on the horse.
roaming is dangerous at this level. constantly accidentally running into level 9-11 bad guys
Yeah I've noticed that lol.
Good ratings out of sympathy. Right, @Gunny?
One thing me and Fry will agree on is Nintendo lol.
I'll let you know how it is, grabbing first thing in the morning.
Wonder if and when the Switch might drop in price? I'd really love to have one but can't justify $300 for the handful of games I'd end up playing before getting bored with it.
Not for a while.
As a new father, this is the best console I've owned. It's so easy to integrate into your life. That alone makes it worth the money to me.
If you are big into indies, this is the place to play them.
Thought I'd add an edit on my initial thoughts. I watched the reveal event like a year ago and laughed. Thought it was a disaster.
Last edited by a moderator:
If he has a PS4, which I think he does, then no it isn't. Not even close.
Okay now I'm convinced you have something against Nintendo lol.
Indies will literally run the same on PS4 vs Switch. On switch you get the additional function of portability.
So what your trying to say here is, let's take stardew valley, the indie im playing ATM.
SDV on PS4>SDV on Switch.
Could you provide me your logic here?
I have nothing against Nintendo, however I am convinced you can't read.
If he has a PS4 already then it's not even a competition, aside from there are a shit tonne more (and better) indies on PS4 than Switch, and this is purely because the PS4 has been out a lot longer than the Switch, he doesn't need to spend $300 to play Stardew Valley.
That's the logic.
It's not 300 to play stardew lol. It's an added benefit to play games on the go. If one owns both PS4 and Switch, any future indies one wishes to play would be better served to be played on the switch.
Except it is 300 to play it BECAUSE HE DOESN'T HAVE A SWITCH. Literally the only way he can play Stardew Valley on the switch is to spend $300 on a Switch to play it.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
