Their programming is complete.
I don’t think it’s feminist to not care if a ref is female.
Also not feminist to argue that the possible delay in reaction probably won’t make a difference.
Also not feminist to argue that the possible delay in reaction probably won’t make a difference.
betas gonna beta
Don’t need another 40 year old kicker. Try to find a good young one that can stick around a while and who’s leg isn’t losing distance all the time.
I wouldn't be mad at it. Would rather get Jake Moody in the draft but I'm good with anyone that can kick beyond 50 yards
That or Matt Gay would be a nice signing.
At 40 why would Gould not want to stay with a team that was close to a SB?
Last edited by a moderator:
he says that to try and make the 49ers give him more money…. I’m happy to test the market…. What most FAs say
I’d honestly take Moody as high as the 5th round. That important IMO.
I often wondered if a kicker was automatic from 60 and under. Would he be worth the first overall pick? I'd assume so.
Only one taken in first round if I can remember. Raiders took Janikowski. He was superb, almost Kern level!
I don’t think a K would ever be a 1st overall but I could see a 1st rounder although I think those days are likely in the past.
Janikowski is the only I can remember either. Considering how bad the Raiders were for a stretch and he was about the only thing scoring, I’d say it wasn’t a bad pick. Really, when he was picked, they were a SB contender, so may be the thought was he was a big piece putting them over the top.
aints took erkslaven first round and he was a K/P saving a roster spot... not sure who held ... I would assume backup QB...
anyhow my memory was he was good at both but no Guy or Stenerud
anyhow my memory was he was good at both but no Guy or Stenerud
I would too given the impact of most 5th rounders.
I don’t understand the point in having 5th year options on draft picks if they refuse to play on them. Can teams get a refund for players like Farley and Wilson that contribute nothing? Everything always has to be to the players’ benefit. Slowly ruining the league.
I agree with the BS of players threatening to sit 5th year options.
it’s a back and forth battle that seems to need renegotiating every few years. Players won with the outrageous 1st round pick contracts in the early 2000’s, then owners won with the rookie contract ceilings, it looks like the players are going to get a the advantage again (from a rookie standpoint, not referring to the FA piece).
This simply isn't true.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
