Levis knew he'd be exposed. He's a one read QB who has no touch. Now, he could be a Josh Allen comp, but doesn't have the numbers to back it up.
I think he tried with Philips. Remains to be seen if he can be PR without fumbling, be a WR, stay healthy.
It has to be for Bryce Young if you're making a splash like that. Stroud's ceiling is not high enough to be giving up what it takes to move up to #1. I would even prefer Levis over Stroud at #1 since you're taking a home run swing anyway.
oh man the Priest Holmes was a separate thought... gonna have to delete that... did not belong there... should be Robert Woods
If you move from 11 to 1, you better not be taking a swing at all. He better be a sure thing and I don’t see any of these QB’s as that. That’s why I say stay at 11, get the best LT and stick with Tannehill until his contract ends.
well I would extend/rework T17 to lower crazy 23 CAP but whatevers
IIRC 23 CAP gonna be like $25m or something
IIRC 23 CAP gonna be like $25m or something
Better off to just pay it and get it over with, than to keep digging the hole deeper.
Young to me is a sure thing, but I agree that this is the year to rebuild the offense through the draft. Much better to go into the post-Tanny era without so many offensive holes to mess with the new QB's success.
I actually would prefer they move on from Tannehill this year and throw in Dobbs or Willis and tank 2023 but we know Vrabel won't be down with that.
reject loser culture and embrace winning
194 lbs. Had to put on a lot of weight to play in the NFL. Will he be the same player after he adds the weight? That’s far from a sure thing. He’s not even close.
No... Levis is not a home run swing .. Levis is a pop fly with 2 outs, bottom of the 9th..
It's gonna be easier to build OL in FA who can contribute. Move on from a Tanne and we could have 55+ million in cap room. Obviously a at LT, Brown is the only real difference maker, but there are a 2-3 other guys I think could be serviceable at LT.
He didn't beat any of those teams in the playoffs though. And certainly he didn't play great in many of those games, which means he wasn't the primary reason we won. In the case of the Bengal however, he was absolutely the primary reason we lost.
Kareem Hunt maybe? Either way, your point still stands.
Disagree with you there. If I knew a RB was gonna be arguably the GOAT, I would have no qualms taking him 1st round, no. 1 overall even. But obviously we can't know that, so it's irrelevant.
Never understood this logic.
He loses close games in a rematch of a team that was beat meaning the capability is proven they can beat these teams with THill but the selective losses in the playoffs is the defining game for some people even when it it’s a team sport.
I think it’s just easy for some people to simplify things and blame the QB. Then also count a bad game, which every single QB ever has had, and say that’s what will always be the case.
I get it, people aren’t sold on THill, that’s fine, but the logic of “can’t win in the playoffs”, can’t beat certain QBs, etc is complete flaw and doesn’t account for the rest of the titans team nor does it give credit to good teams.
THill is 2-3 in the playoffs, but even then, folks just look at a stat line and say, welll, the 2 wins aren’t because of THill, but the 3 losses are.
it also completely overlooks the average QBs that reach the final 4 regularly.
Last edited by a moderator:
It will have to be a blend of draft and FA agency. There is no way to secure 4 quality OL in FA at a reasonable price. None. We must draft top quality prospects as well.
Hunt isn't even number 1 on his own team lol
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
